| To: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel? |
| From: | zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:21:53 +0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=TY6N3LBhZjAZSUenpH7e5RSZ6uCngnFfIBKW/ZyRX18=; b=R6KVThlN3x1ziBdLUl0YuyfjFm0fQXM7xfG0pzBrNQvghpUzCILqeODH8r8vsJRFtgqnNWITxWtq09cF4y/XWFpcQCG0xy1TVsFtVvqWuoo5lB4IUc7glEqfWW8pGg1cVteWtuvlgHtEmpx6mZrZHNjBDiaU7gVmqqVWhiOJkSw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Lnf/T7jUYIGYp8dSjFqnvOE/spt3Pu4eSWrbXEyF743W1B2mUWdTRhbH8HoX/ug/dzZTcAzNBH5HXNdFIa8Y8PpEY4UeqLtcwkaEzkijmC3krhtesF90RfW8Q3CTk+Y+g/dS9ZW/z4CUaqcNb/j9mQxtyseYgbW7jhsKMCkpypc= |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
|
hello, all i have a mips board, and the SDRAM speed(bus clock) is not too fast. so i want change the SAVE_ALL and RESTORE_ALL to use internal-ram(high speed). i just wonder whether the SAVE_ALL netsting in kernel for mips arch? if not, i think maybe 1k byte for SAVE_ALL is enough( 32regs X4, and some cp0_regs). but if the SAVE_ALL nesting, maybe i need to keep a stack in internal-ram. thanks for any hints. Best Regards -- zzh |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][1/7] AR7: core support, Matteo Croce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
| Previous by Thread: | IP22 64bit kernel, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |