| To: | "Chris Wedgwood" <cw@f00f.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 |
| From: | "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:41:04 -0300 |
| Cc: | "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@kernel.org>, "Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@o2.pl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kJ8Vu64KKjNiL5xP+IVsAetxZSGI7JxOdZNafXK/+lrMWqUzAxEihpXGu4PczyPKrxuy+oNGBx18Jpf2jbzemVBzp4/HrMDpH7S7WW9g9uKFTpIeqwXx/AW3/41YIsDwcy2HkcnCWHx4aIupk2Rpc1DobwkAe9hjAIJonJFDVBE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cN4tXoYMxt/nrUp0m8GRowxotWIePfjMMlyUXlSbA+oCc1bAnsrAPg191j7/xlp63WkmmT4ozcxwCUqsoSPewHIxmCy3GrPYXtIBuP3NwfUZnU2dFopbUyY+WfXhUtyRqfywpVBMpwhGD9/XpDuRjCQzWXtYb9u9IDJ7vrNpstA= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070821182505.GA20968@puku.stupidest.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20070821132038.GA22254@ff.dom.local> <20070821093103.3c097d4a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070821173550.GC30705@stusta.de> <20070821182505.GA20968@puku.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On 8/21/07, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:35:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Are there any architectures still requiring a gcc < 4.0 ? > > Yes, sadly in some places (embedded) there are people with older > compiler who want newer kernels. Last time I tried a mips build, it would fail the compile unless I was using _exactly_ 3.4.4 (I didn't tried older versions, but did try 3.4.6, for ex.). So I also think the 3.4 series will still have to be around for a while. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Add back support for LASAT platforms, brm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0, Segher Boessenkool |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Add back support for LASAT platforms, brm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0, Segher Boessenkool |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |