| To: | Dajie Tan <jiankemeng@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for profiling Loongson 2E |
| From: | John Levon <levon@movementarian.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:52:35 +0100 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, inux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, phil.el@wanadoo.fr, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net |
| In-reply-to: | <5861a7880707242041w32811dal6e2765747cbada32@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <5861a7880707240220g5d8129anc95e10bea833e323@mail.gmail.com> <20070724144051.GA17256@linux-mips.org> <5861a7880707242041w32811dal6e2765747cbada32@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:41:21AM +0400, Dajie Tan wrote: > >Why do you need this change? It almost looks as if you're papering over > >a bug where add_sample should not be called at all. > > Yeah,this change is to enhance the robust of oprofile. When using > performace counter manually(writting control register in a module, no > need to use the oprofile),I usually make kernel panic if I do not > initialize the oprofile and enable the overflow interrupt carelessly. > So, this change can avoid this panic. :D This panic is good and should stay. It shows that you've made a mistake. john |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for profiling Loongson 2E, Dajie Tan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tx49xx: add some mach specific headers, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for profiling Loongson 2E, Dajie Tan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for profiling Loongson 2E, Dajie Tan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |