Re: [PATCH] bcm1480 serial build fix

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

> >  Aren't all the bits in "bcm1480_regs.h" meant to be prefixed with 
> > BCM1480_DUART?
> 
> Appatenly not, guessing from the header's contents.

 There are two or three exceptions buried indeed.

> >  These headers are a horrible mess anyway -- a single definition should be 
> > enough to access the two DUARTs the BCM1480 seems to have...
> 
> Indeed. I just took the path of least resistance to make it work again.

 Sure. :)  But it looks like you merely follow the tradition here...

  Maciej