linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>

To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:50:50 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <46A0F453.60005@ru.mvista.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20070720164043.523003359@mail.of.borg> <20070720164324.097994947@mail.of.borg> <20070720173132.GB19424@linux-mips.org> <20070720173359.GA22423@infradead.org> <46A0F453.60005@ru.mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:43:47PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello Christoph:
> 
> >>>+#include <asm/irq.h>
> 
> >>These days that should probably be <linux/irq.h>.
> 
> >Not at all, linux/irq.h is something entirely different.
> 
>    Actually, <linux/interrupt.h>

Not for enable/disable_irq.  For request_irq, yes.

This is something that should be fixed.

-- 
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>