linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:34:48 -0600
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <20070720173132.GB19424@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20070720164043.523003359@mail.of.borg> <20070720164324.097994947@mail.of.borg> <20070720173132.GB19424@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:40:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > +#include <asm/irq.h>
> 
> These days that should probably be <linux/irq.h>.

Go and read the comments at the top of linux/irq.h.
And then report to Russell for your whipping.

-- 
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>