Re: [PATCH] generic clk API implementation for MIPS

[Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>]

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:02:53 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> It seems that clock configuration highly depends on the board, not the
> arch. For example, a board can have only static clocks which won't be
> unregistered later. In that case most of code provided by the patch is
> useless.
> 
> So maybe the best thing is to let each board implements their own
> generic clock API (exactly like the generic GPIO API you did
> recently). Or make a default implementation (your patch) and allow
> others boards to make their own implementation.

Hmm... I had thought the default implementation would be useful, but
now I change my mind ;)  What people expected on its implementation
would vary too much.

Now I think leaving all implementation to platform code is better.
I'll send rbtx4938 implementation (minimum one just for SPI driver)
soon.

Ralf, please do not apply or queue this patch :)

---
Atsushi Nemoto