[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH] TXx9 SPI controller driver

Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH] TXx9 SPI controller driver
From: Atsushi Nemoto <>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:56:00 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:09:51 -0700, David Brownell <> wrote:
> > And for mmiowb() issue, I put it just only I was not sure whether
> > gpio_set_value() guarantee I/O barrier.  Now I see i2c-gpio.c, etc. do
> > not have such barriers.  I will remove these barriers and fix platform
> > gpio codes.
> I don't think this is a case where there'd be a benefit to
> allowing non-barriered implementations, and thus requiring
> all portable code to include platform-neutral I/O barriers.
> I don't know that such neutral primitives actually exist...
> I'll update the GPIO docs to make that clear, unless you
> have some strong argument to the contrary.

No contrary argument.  Some guide to writers of GPIO implementations
about the I/O barriers should be appreciated.

Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>