[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code.

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code.
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:00:12 +0200
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qkRQ8v31O+zOx3AnZN9L5KRleg3UavN8+sFeyWt9D7v/tQrz+EI+A7AFigroKxDIxb726O4kn+JceDK6VtGiAp2kSiGyCpZHAXfrcP5HEtq7KU/UAgiFb1HJDkXzERHKlOLF/L+jJtKKrz0IqL+lkAiNldic1kQlbfbejCj/wJY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hcZ9gCw2DLnJeeghY+jAyC2FscgIPCK7m1Bqso8liuo94ZCo5+zkF2kymNSSDpR5oTkjxznMHtjYlXJjl7P1bojsw6buW0UCf/JP/IxbOoXnYp0jgv26DkkL57joH3em81h/3kZYeY+UqhW4TIhKI9z/OzP6rwQrMtqJOUIn0Y0=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <>
On 6/19/07, Atsushi Nemoto <> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:33:33 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <> 
> What do you mean by "pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt
> routines" ? Do you mean that it should copy the whole clock event
> driver ?
> It seems to me that using cp0 hpt as a clock event only is a valid usage...

Well, I thought the customized cp0 clockevent codes (custom
.set_next_event routine is needed anyway, isn't it?)

I don't think so.

hpt-cp0.c clock event part doesn't care if the counter is cleared when
an interrupt is triggered. It matters only for clock source (well I
think) that's why I suggested to rewrite a clock source driver only
for this platform...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>