Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code.

["Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>]

On 6/19/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:33:33 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > What do you mean by "pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt
> > routines" ? Do you mean that it should copy the whole clock event
> > driver ?
> >
> > It seems to me that using cp0 hpt as a clock event only is a valid usage...
>
> Well, I thought the customized cp0 clockevent codes (custom
> .set_next_event routine is needed anyway, isn't it?)
I don't think so.

hpt-cp0.c clock event part doesn't care if the counter is cleared when
an interrupt is triggered. It matters only for clock source (well I
think) that's why I suggested to rewrite a clock source driver only
for this platform...

--
              Franck