| To: | "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code. |
| From: | "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:33:33 +0200 |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qo7DBTFOrf/FbVO+E4EI5rxGRSa9teQazHVWWLWBuJDVINuhlyA3ShcbJJuT651Jj4YZugE87JL4lWPfQkRt8HBwZnQjV0cDhfLinNspWrL7TinhJygZQSOT6C5UTD8z/MTTg0yYYHKvqAB8JWrpDcdbQMBZ8zWSpvFle6eQmhY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jzkoY1RcYJHU147h7mbTIYJ4as6b6uNSS/NJuNChZ8rJx9hJoykFz0/G04f9T7167wef0khv3ABJ1YQ/T48m4ctH+gAG8L/zyLmtkh59rukNbUm/WryECaITWnm/MtLEK+HLXd2Mel6/bNn819MA5GWh8jl7CHg90k1TkOWFBNM= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070619.005121.118948229.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80706170636kbff000cw849fa1d5ccf31152@mail.gmail.com> <20070618.011425.93018724.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <cda58cb80706180238r17da4434jcdee307b0385729b@mail.gmail.com> <20070619.005121.118948229.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hi Atsushi, On 6/18/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:38:28 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > What do you think ? For now, I think bloating generic setup_cp0_hpt() for this particular chip is not good. The pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt routines. But it's just a thought...
What do you mean by "pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt
routines" ? Do you mean that it should copy the whole clock event
driver ?
It seems to me that using cp0 hpt as a clock event only is a valid usage...
--
Franck
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Legacy PCI IO for PCI graphics on SGI O2...Anybody?, sknauert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Legacy PCI IO for PCI graphics on SGI O2...Anybody?, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code., Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code., Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |