linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code.

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code.
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:33:33 +0200
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qo7DBTFOrf/FbVO+E4EI5rxGRSa9teQazHVWWLWBuJDVINuhlyA3ShcbJJuT651Jj4YZugE87JL4lWPfQkRt8HBwZnQjV0cDhfLinNspWrL7TinhJygZQSOT6C5UTD8z/MTTg0yYYHKvqAB8JWrpDcdbQMBZ8zWSpvFle6eQmhY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jzkoY1RcYJHU147h7mbTIYJ4as6b6uNSS/NJuNChZ8rJx9hJoykFz0/G04f9T7167wef0khv3ABJ1YQ/T48m4ctH+gAG8L/zyLmtkh59rukNbUm/WryECaITWnm/MtLEK+HLXd2Mel6/bNn819MA5GWh8jl7CHg90k1TkOWFBNM=
In-reply-to: <20070619.005121.118948229.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80706170636kbff000cw849fa1d5ccf31152@mail.gmail.com> <20070618.011425.93018724.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <cda58cb80706180238r17da4434jcdee307b0385729b@mail.gmail.com> <20070619.005121.118948229.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Hi Atsushi,

On 6/18/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:38:28 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> What do you think ?

For now, I think bloating generic setup_cp0_hpt() for this particular
chip is not good.  The pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt
routines.  But it's just a thought...


What do you mean by "pnx8550 can have customized copy of cp0_hpt
routines" ? Do you mean that it should copy the whole clock event
driver ?

It seems to me that using cp0 hpt as a clock event only is a valid usage...
--
              Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>