| To: | "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code. |
| From: | "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:34:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CR7hY2QXfX7CibH1bDRaJLKphbxizpl0+BdvjLEi6nVNCt3y7cNA9821x5LmdiLVbg1wz5qFVktFJSG1UQ6P4gAtCTrcJTku2UbPltcznbmKWqzKnRH8oqlXHXwi12Yl8ugDJ8gmEazADeAIdBb16RhurFBMzjvbTnOKifVl170= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lmNG6Vq8KGrfIx5g1c4qvtYGX9AIZ+8Minr5JXJ6MvYGYOLC5xiFa9m5X9rOicxlSEl8YPvnb0b+Hw6vojV6963tSdVIj6C9Dq5eYNZcB5ja+NJBWE7vgq2D/IWIrfcyT5w795kpuBmeatp0Dmcm9wsn6aIDB2NBc368vC0iLD0= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070615143838.GA11094@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <11818164023940-git-send-email-fbuihuu@gmail.com> <cda58cb80706140643g63c3bf34sbd5b843a15653c3d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0706141501080.25868@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80706140731j1b6e8e36l96d4423db1ffd9e7@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0706141648540.25868@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80706150159j5c3d5b7p4293dc529d5ee97c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0706151117180.3754@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20070615132613.GA16133@linux-mips.org> <cda58cb80706150724i1cbbfd1aw51d23d18e35f6266@mail.gmail.com> <20070615143838.GA11094@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On 6/15/07, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:24:36PM +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > Do you think it's possible to work out a common version of this > calibration without to many hacks ? Or should we simply move the > current generic one into the dec code and resolve this point later ? I think that this will be pretty easy and only moderately timeconsuming.
Mind to send a patch that will do that ? ;)
--
Franck
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | "Segfault/illegal instruction" - udevd - ntpd - glibc, Sadarul Firos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code., Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Deforest the function pointer jungle in the time code., Sergei Shtylyov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |