linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable arbitary speed tty support

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable arbitary speed tty support
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:30:08 +0100
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@osdl.org, rmk@arm.linux.kernel.org, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, takata@linux-m32r.org, chris@zankel.net, uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp, kyle@parisc-linux.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705232233360.10610@anakin>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20070523174446.37abfa7a@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705232117260.10610@anakin> <20070523205645.07b03581@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705232233360.10610@anakin>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
> Why not `#define termios2 ktermios' (or vice versa) on platforms where
> they are the same?

Because #define is a bit of a loose cannon when it comes to substitutions
and I didn't want nasty suprises. Also because ktermios may change in
future and I don't want to have to liase with 4 million port maintainers
when it does. The whole point of ktermios was to isolate the kernel and
user space views.

Alan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>