Re: SGI O2 meth: missing sysfs device symlink

[Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>]

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:51:30PM -0400, Kumba wrote:

> Didn't test on 2.6.22 (yet), but 2.6.21.1 works:

That's the only one I care about for purposes of upstream patch submission
anyway.

> Btw, If we wanted to protect meth from the speculative execution issues of 
> the R10000 processor, what's the right way for that?  I believe IP28 used a 
> special type of buffer for protecting Seeq from the DMA wonkiness that 
> occurs, but I got the indication that Meth would need a different approach.

I don't see why the standard approach would fail for meth.

  Ralf