| To: | post@pfrst.de |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: R1000 status |
| From: | Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 May 2007 15:01:33 -0400 |
| Cc: | Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705190928580.182@Indigo2.Peter> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <49027.193.253.35.188.1179557496.squirrel@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0705190928580.182@Indigo2.Peter> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) |
peter fuerst wrote: Hello, yes, the GCC-patches should do the trick. And without a significant performance decrease, as i was told in the latest success-report (see http://sgi.sedlacek.biz/). kind regards Interesting, I'm curious to see this guy's patches to see what he does different for the IP32 R10K stuff. Whether it's the same thing I did (mod IP28 patches and build w/ gcc cache barriers on load and store ops), or if he went an extra step and added code to protect the scsi and networking drivers. --Kumba -- Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: R1000 status, Kumba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Au1200 and NAND Flash - K9F1G08U0A -, borasah |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: R1000 status, peter fuerst |
| Next by Thread: | Re: R1000 status, Kumba |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |