linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/

To: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/
From: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:16 +0100
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, trivial@kernel.org
In-reply-to: <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk>
Openpgp: id=89C93563
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060819)
On 11/05/07 20:42, Simon Arlott wrote:
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
index 1265358..b363604 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 *    return old_count;
 *
* On machines without lld/scd we need a spinlock to make the manipulation of
- * sem->count and sem->waking atomic.  Scalability isn't an issue because
+ * sem->count and sem->waking atomic.  Scalibility isn't an issue because
 * this lock is used on UP only so it's just an empty variable.
 */
static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)

I thought I'd reverted that mistake... it was correct already, too many "capability" fixes confusing me :/

--
Simon Arlott

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>