| To: | Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/ |
| From: | Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, trivial@kernel.org |
| In-reply-to: | <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk> |
| Openpgp: | id=89C93563 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060819) |
On 11/05/07 20:42, Simon Arlott wrote: diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c index 1265358..b363604 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ * return old_count; ** On machines without lld/scd we need a spinlock to make the manipulation of- * sem->count and sem->waking atomic. Scalability isn't an issue because + * sem->count and sem->waking atomic. Scalibility isn't an issue because * this lock is used on UP only so it's just an empty variable. */ static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr) I thought I'd reverted that mistake... it was correct already, too many "capability" fixes confusing me :/ -- Simon Arlott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/, Simon Arlott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Run checksyscalls for N32 and O32 ABI, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/, Simon Arlott |
| Next by Thread: | Alchemy MMC driver maintenance., Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |