linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Run checksyscalls for N32 and O32 ABI

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Run checksyscalls for N32 and O32 ABI
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:23:55 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k6TWZIHLpRWhIN4a6fiwA1KAaTZETH2S+VN3w1zC5rvL6rl9tfRSd4I56LLk2GWP8xgqCht81r1Qj/D1io2zR4b66VEIrmPsTQ857e6gfU6NY3W/kHC68z5EvWZfR4Z5D1WvO+s1VIDkqP3nHVdGmlb41GM/t7dKO5iW6qhvFK8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tUdbq27jCiVSdBol8mUSIUtdaaO47k8rodRk4o/bRTL7s/5ogyIqxDS+LmlziAId9C8CE05lWEigkEZCUfQyHyPvGar7hQKR8jLwxs9D3DFxBOEMe5MB5j1RtXmaQ/3ev3jE3ldzZw/sc4wJ8m/oJzBEJqwDK9bjEkoWaYRK5Jk=
In-reply-to: <20070512.005905.26096031.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20070511.010234.74566169.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <cda58cb80705110514g1098de81lec547e774eb76482@mail.gmail.com> <20070512.005905.26096031.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On 5/11/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
 archprepare:
 ifdef CONFIG_MIPS32_N32
-       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/mips missing-syscalls-n32
+       @echo '  Checking missing-syscalls for N32'
+       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=. missing-syscalls EXTRA_CFLAGS="-mabi=n32"
 endif
 ifdef CONFIG_MIPS32_O32
-       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/mips missing-syscalls-o32
+       @echo '  Checking missing-syscalls for O32'
+       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=. missing-syscalls EXTRA_CFLAGS="-mabi=32"
 endif


Well I'm not sure how revelant are the echos...

But I still think that (a) you shouldn't put any command in
'archprepare' multiple rule (b) you should move this rule from the
cleaning targets.

Thanks
--
              Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>