| To: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:12:32 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, kumba@gentoo.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ths@networkno.de |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80703260907g6f349298xf85b2e2954a7b6a7@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80703260831t576ff7c5wef1e34e3367e7c45@mail.gmail.com> <20070327.004511.31449250.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <cda58cb80703260907g6f349298xf85b2e2954a7b6a7@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:07:21 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, I suppose a warning is fine. What about this patch on top of the patchset > ? > > diff --git a/arch/mips/Makefile b/arch/mips/Makefile > index 3ec0c12..b886945 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/Makefile > +++ b/arch/mips/Makefile > @@ -627,7 +627,12 @@ ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > endif > > ifeq ($(KBUILD_SYM32), y) > - cflags-y += -msym32 -DKBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 > + ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,-msym32), y) > + cflags-y += -msym32 -DKBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 > + else > + $(warning '-msym32' option is not supported by your compiler. \ > + You should use a new one to get best result) > + endif > endif > endif Well, I feel even a warning is intrusive, while it is not necessary optimization. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely, Kumba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: flush_anon_page for MIPS, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]: Remove CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 entirely, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |