Nevermind on this one. I just noticed that the original patch is not
needed.
~Deepak
On Mar 19 2007, at 16:49, Deepak Saxena was caught saying:
> Fix MIPS udelay to make is preempt safe under DEBUG_PREEMPT
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@mvista.com>
>
> ---
>
> This needs to go into -rt patch set or directly into the MIPS tree.
> Applies cleanly to 2.6.21-rc4 and 2.6.21-rc3-rt0.
>
> include/asm-mips/delay.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.18/include/asm-mips/delay.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18.orig/include/asm-mips/delay.h
> +++ linux-2.6.18/include/asm-mips/delay.h
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline void __udelay(unsigned lon
> __delay(usecs);
> }
>
> -#define __udelay_val cpu_data[smp_processor_id()].udelay_val
> +#define __udelay_val cpu_data[raw_smp_processor_id()].udelay_val
>
> #define udelay(usecs) __udelay((usecs),__udelay_val)
>
>
> --
> Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@plexity.net - http://www.plexity.net
>
> In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask
> "why were their poets silent?" - Bertolt Brecht
--
Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@plexity.net - http://www.plexity.net
In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask
"why were their poets silent?" - Bertolt Brecht
|