| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64 |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:48:54 -0400 |
| Cc: | Peter Watkins <pwatkins@sicortex.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20070313164107.GA5004@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> <20070310132423.GA1295@linux-mips.org> <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> <20070313164107.GA5004@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:41:07PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > This will break the ABI only for uses of si_band and si_fd, and only > > on n64. Anyone see a reason why I shouldn't change glibc? > > > > Ralf, as I mentioned on IRC, I've got bigger worries about siginfo. > > Shouldn't n32 be using the same siginfo as o32? It's got pointers in it. > > Yes, you're right. Will you cook up a patch? I won't have time any time soon - my MIPS board isn't hooked up. If no one has by the time I get around to it next, though, I'll try. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] jmr3927 cleanup, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] EMMA2RH I2C driver, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |