linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:48:54 -0400
Cc: Peter Watkins <pwatkins@sicortex.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20070313164107.GA5004@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> <20070310132423.GA1295@linux-mips.org> <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> <20070313164107.GA5004@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:41:07PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > This will break the ABI only for uses of si_band and si_fd, and only
> > on n64.  Anyone see a reason why I shouldn't change glibc?
> > 
> > Ralf, as I mentioned on IRC, I've got bigger worries about siginfo.
> > Shouldn't n32 be using the same siginfo as o32?  It's got pointers in it.
> 
> Yes, you're right.  Will you cook up a patch?

I won't have time any time soon - my MIPS board isn't hooked up.
If no one has by the time I get around to it next, though, I'll try.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>