| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:41:07 +0000 |
| Cc: | Peter Watkins <pwatkins@sicortex.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> <20070310132423.GA1295@linux-mips.org> <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This will break the ABI only for uses of si_band and si_fd, and only > on n64. Anyone see a reason why I shouldn't change glibc? > > Ralf, as I mentioned on IRC, I've got bigger worries about siginfo. > Shouldn't n32 be using the same siginfo as o32? It's got pointers in it. Yes, you're right. Will you cook up a patch? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Add __user tags to {save,restore}_fp_context variants, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] drivers: PMC MSP71xx LED driver, Marc St-Jean |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |