| To: | Peter Watkins <pwatkins@sicortex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:24:24 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:46:25PM -0500, Peter Watkins wrote: > The siginfo field si_fd is incorrect on n64 because the band field does > not match glibc. Susv3 says: [...] The <signal.h> header shall define the siginfo_t type as a structure that includes at least the following members: [...] long si_band Band event for SIGPOLL. [...] So the kernel is right, glibc is wrong I'd say ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Trouble with sound/mips/au1x00.c AC97 driver, Marco Braga |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup FPU ownership management (alternative version), Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64., Peter Watkins |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |