Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init

linux-mips

Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A()

To:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A()
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:11:28 +0000
Cc:	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to:	<20070220.200845.98359099.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Original-recipient:	rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References:	<20070220.200845.98359099.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Sender:	linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.2i

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:08:45PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> init_8259A() is called from i8259A_resume() so should not be marked as
> __init.  And add some tests for whether 8259A was already initialized
> or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>

Thanks, applied.

  Ralf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A(), Atsushi Nemoto Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A(), Ralf Baechle <= section mismatches (Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A()), Atsushi Nemoto

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] Optimize generic get_unaligned / put_unaligned implementations., Pavel Machek
Next by Date:	section mismatches (Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A()), Atsushi Nemoto
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A(), Atsushi Nemoto
Next by Thread:	section mismatches (Re: [PATCH] Drop __init from init_8259A()), Atsushi Nemoto
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]