| To: | "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 |
| From: | "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:36:56 +0100 |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HC1/13Pykf4h5QPJIgIkD65qZrlRK6DbftFvBIPAElUXgc2xmGvPuxfaHPTomU0P3XDu9khlBCIfC9zNwgYq1K1kwta3WZbEQMgMSnaUBWlAn9nP1vuj3HAk9XUyO6nu8cvoh78lmM27f0tQu9rjLM+bduqsQz5SZSgRFZLIm/w= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070215.011420.15247947.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80702130909u2c0cbe8fg6929fc78ca8d3cb8@mail.gmail.com> <20070214.102801.41198530.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80702140020l319b987agc88e87c3acaa5e07@mail.gmail.com> <20070215.011420.15247947.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On 2/14/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote: Same here. I just think introducing one name is better than two name. I also feel "make KBUILD_SYM32=0" is more consistent.
Yes I agree KBUILD_SYM32 seems better for command line usage but I
think it won't be used widely unlike in code usage where
KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 is better because it's really self explaned and not
ambigous: "build a 64 bits kernel with 32 bits symbols".
And I think it's more important.
--
Franck
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Optimize generic get_unaligned / put_unaligned implementations., Marcel Holtmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Who know latest Linux/MIPS ABI ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |