| To: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:14:20 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80702140020l319b987agc88e87c3acaa5e07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80702130909u2c0cbe8fg6929fc78ca8d3cb8@mail.gmail.com> <20070214.102801.41198530.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80702140020l319b987agc88e87c3acaa5e07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:20:22 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a good point. What about replacing BUILD by KBUILD meaning this > macro is coming from Kbuild itsel ? No objections. > And maybe it would be interesting to make obvious that this macro > implies 64-bits kernel. What about something like KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32 > and replace 'BUILD_ELF32=no' by 'KBUILD_SYM32=no' ? Same here. I just think introducing one name is better than two name. I also feel "make KBUILD_SYM32=0" is more consistent. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [MIPS] Check FCSR for pending interrupts before restoring from a context., Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Optimize generic get_unaligned / put_unaligned implementations., Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |