linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64

To: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Automatically set CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:14:20 +0900 (JST)
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <cda58cb80702140020l319b987agc88e87c3acaa5e07@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80702130909u2c0cbe8fg6929fc78ca8d3cb8@mail.gmail.com> <20070214.102801.41198530.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80702140020l319b987agc88e87c3acaa5e07@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:20:22 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> That's a good point. What about replacing BUILD by KBUILD meaning this
> macro is coming from Kbuild itsel ?

No objections.

> And maybe it would be interesting to make obvious that this macro
> implies 64-bits kernel. What about something like KBUILD_64BIT_SYM32
> and replace 'BUILD_ELF32=no' by 'KBUILD_SYM32=no' ?

Same here.  I just think introducing one name is better than two name.
I also feel "make KBUILD_SYM32=0" is more consistent.

---
Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>