| To: | Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:49:41 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, dan@debian.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80702010759w505b4b8br44fb75be28cc8ff0@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80701290806p5d68ba5ck5e3e3b2b3490126f@mail.gmail.com> <20070129161450.GA3384@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701291833480.26916@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20070130.234537.126574565.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701301713350.9231@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80702010151x62e3b92ap18c63110f7fd4f0c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0702011233240.7161@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80702010759w505b4b8br44fb75be28cc8ff0@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > It gives good default behaviours without both user's intervention or > configuration: > > if CONFIG_64BITS > ifndef sym32 > if load-y in XKPHYS > sym32 = '' [1] > elif load-y in CKSEG0 > sym32 = '-msym32' [2] > else > if sym32 eq 'yes' > sym32 = '-msym32' [3] > endef > fi > cflags-y += $(sym32) > > [1] since there is no reason to add '-msym32' and it would generate > wrong code anyways. > [2] since it's used by all platforms to generate smaller code. > Warn if this option is not supported by the tool chains. > [3] if you really want to generate code loaded in CKSEG0 without > -msym32 switch you could always do: > > $ make sym32=no Well, it seems fair enough indeed, as long as the availability of "-msym32" is verified as suggested by Atsushi-san. > IMHO, for normal users, this case is probably a configuration > bug and that's the reason we should request for a user to ask for > it explicitly. Hmm, that just raises the question for a definition of who a "normal user" is. And in general -- what "normality" is and why exactly that and not something else. ;-) Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] eXcite nand flash driver, Thomas Gleixner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [MIPS] Check FCSR for pending interrupts before restoring from a context., Franck Bui-Huu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |