| To: | "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about signal syscalls ! |
| From: | "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:08:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>, "David Daney" <ddaney@avtrex.com>, linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n2snF/qZM4EW3WYzk0lQdxadWFJ3V15aylBEoYZ+h7NjyLDny71deSI+3PrBLIA7n25G4wSamOmrXriXK06rpgnAUaMpQ/t9PXCqq6vPRFqg5JBKDPgepxR33Dda+4NArhj7OP6BRiaxhMxQTwlf+x2PcUDqN4CSVaqVNxqpZYE= |
| In-reply-to: | <20070205011048.GA26654@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20070201135734.GB12728@linux-mips.org> <45C21CFE.9060804@avtrex.com> <cda58cb80702020055t6eb2578fn5d1e4370e9ebda08@mail.gmail.com> <45C3611D.7000702@avtrex.com> <cda58cb80702020836t54ab54bam1b83dd7c1dacb4d8@mail.gmail.com> <45C36D46.5040409@avtrex.com> <cda58cb80702021158n42bdb5fbi6cca4f2c8dff6782@mail.gmail.com> <45C3A1E3.8010802@avtrex.com> <20070205005516.GA1581@nevyn.them.org> <20070205011048.GA26654@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On 2/5/07, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: Not saving the s-registers into the signal frame would be a neat optimization. It wouldn't only make things a little faster it would
Actually it seems to me that setup_sigcontext() is almost completly
useless if the signal handler is dealt when returning from a system
call since just a very few registers are saved in the 'struct pt_regs'
structure. So setup_sigcontext() ends up saving a lot of random
values.
--
Franck
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [MIPS] Do not allow oprofile to be enabled on SMTC., Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |