| To: | Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about signal syscalls ! |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:10:28 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80702010654w74527a34k4ed229b499b8f9b2@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80702010243y4a36026i6945f2a5cd3791d0@mail.gmail.com> <20070201135734.GB12728@linux-mips.org> <cda58cb80702010654w74527a34k4ed229b499b8f9b2@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:54:40PM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > Let's take for example sys_sigreturn(). In my understanding this > syscall is used automatically when the signal handler returns. At this > time, I don't see the point to save the static registers since they > have been already saved by setup_sigcontext(). > > Actually I don't see why they need to be saved/restored at all... There is no need. Seems you found a harmless but longstanding but introduced by c40738a70f3e02e8554b78af334dc95356a78989. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Advice on battery support [was: Advice on APM-EMU reunion], Matt Reimer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |