| To: | macro@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:31:20 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, dan@debian.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0702011233240.7161@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701301713350.9231@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80702010151x62e3b92ap18c63110f7fd4f0c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0702011233240.7161@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:20:15 +0000 (GMT), "Maciej W. Rozycki"
<macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> > if CONFIG_64BITS and ${load-y} in CKSEG0
> > cflags-y += -msym32
> > endif
> >
> > what do you think ?
>
> I do not see enough of justification for -msym32 to be forced. This will
> also raise the minimum version of binutils required to 2.16 for the
> affected platforms, which may be a little bit too aggressive.
Well, $(call cc-option,-msym32) can be used safely. AFAIK -msym32 was
added to gcc 4.0 which was released on Apr 2005, and binutils 2.16 was
release on May 2005. So if gcc accepted -msym32 we can assume
binutils accept too.
I think killing BUILD_ELF64 and adding -msym32 automatically are good
idea. Also I do not think __pa_page_offset() is critical for
performance.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |