| To: | Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about signal syscalls ! |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:57:34 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80702010243y4a36026i6945f2a5cd3791d0@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80702010243y4a36026i6945f2a5cd3791d0@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:43:13AM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > I'm probably missing something very obvious so the subject could have > been "Dumb question of the week". So please be nice when answering ;) > > I'm wondering why we need to save/restore the static registers > (s0...s7) when dealing with some signal system calls. Specially all > of them which are declared by using save_static_function() macros. The values of those registers need to be preserved so they can later be copied into the signal frame. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about signal syscalls !, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |