| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:18:42 +0000 |
| Cc: | macro@linux-mips.org, dan@debian.org, vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20070130.234537.126574565.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80701290806p5d68ba5ck5e3e3b2b3490126f@mail.gmail.com> <20070129161450.GA3384@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701291833480.26916@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20070130.234537.126574565.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:45:37PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:47:12 +0000 (GMT), "Maciej W. Rozycki" > <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote: > > I have BUILD_ELF64 enabled for my SWARM configuration and I do not plan > > to change it. If there is a bug in the definition of __pa_page_offset() > > for such a setup it should be fixed indeed. > > Though I do not object to remove "&& !defined(CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64)" > from __pa_page_offset(), are there any point of CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=y > if your load address was CKSEG0? Code in CKSEG0 allows shorter a shorter code sequence for address loads. Yet some machines such as IP27 require 64-bit ELF for booting. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |