| To: | macro@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:45:37 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | dan@debian.org, vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701291833480.26916@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80701290806p5d68ba5ck5e3e3b2b3490126f@mail.gmail.com> <20070129161450.GA3384@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701291833480.26916@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:47:12 +0000 (GMT), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote: > I have BUILD_ELF64 enabled for my SWARM configuration and I do not plan > to change it. If there is a bug in the definition of __pa_page_offset() > for such a setup it should be fixed indeed. Though I do not object to remove "&& !defined(CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64)" from __pa_page_offset(), are there any point of CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=y if your load address was CKSEG0? --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Advice on APM-EMU reunion, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |