linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Advice on APM-EMU reunion

To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Subject: Re: Advice on APM-EMU reunion
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:00:55 +0900
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20070129230755.GA8705@enneenne.com>
Mail-followup-to: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20070129230755.GA8705@enneenne.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:07:56AM +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> some months ago I sent to the MIPS and ARM mail lists a patch to unify
> the several APM emulation codes adding a new dedicated directory so it
> can be used to put there the per board specific code avoiding code
> duplications (see files ./arch/arm/kernel/apm.c,
> ./arch/mips/kernel/apm.c and ./arch/sh/kernel/apm.c that are almost
> the same).
> 
> The patch is here
> "http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2006-07/msg00144.html";
> and it has been lost in the deep space...
> 
Not quite, the rationale for it being dropped was here:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485831

However, it has since been reposted:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485833
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485834
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485835
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/485837

and merged back in to -mm. This is all post 2.6.20 stuff, though..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>