linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 48/59] sysctl: Register the ocfs2 sysctl numbers

To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 48/59] sysctl: Register the ocfs2 sysctl numbers
From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:37:10 -0800
Cc: "<Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, minyard@acm.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, ak@suse.de, vojtech@suse.cz, clemens@ladisch.de, a.zummo@towertech.it, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-parport@lists.infradead.org, andrea@suse.de, tim@cyberelk.net, philb@gnu.org, aharkes@cs.cmu.edu, coda@cs.cmu.edu, codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, aia21@cantab.net, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, kurt.hackel@oracle.com
In-reply-to: <11689656823041-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <m1ac0jc4no.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> <11689656823041-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Reply-to: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:39:53AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - unquoted
> 
> ocfs2 was did not have the binary number it uses under CTL_FS
> registered in sysctl.h.  Register it to avoid future conflicts,
> and change the name of the definition to be in line with the
> rest of the sysctl numbers.

This looks good - ACK.
        --Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@oracle.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>