linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]

To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:52:15 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sByzxjlNVYkuk6BrJptTOrhUuj/GhqIrS+VRKS8rg4QLfVPvVEG4Gh1jDw+MJ8HkKCP1EwTNMq7/m08dnwyF3l/POEbLz5WH/QP0CnwDhS5L+93OysKRsWDBcczVu6EJHsdhqI2csBajLhJz4SN1N53Rr6/1WepHmKZdFZoiRdo=
In-reply-to: <20070110112054.GA6193@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <116841864595-git-send-email-fbuihuu@gmail.com> <20070110112054.GA6193@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On 1/10/07, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
So this series now works for me, both 1/2 along and 1/2 + 2/2 applied.
So I'll drop this into the 2.6.21 queue.


Great !

What did the console say when 1/2 was applied alone ?

Did you try to set PHYS_OFFSET to something different from 0 when 1/2,
2/2 are applied ? If so, does mem_map[] size decrease ?

Thanks for your time.
--
              Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>