[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0

To: "Ralf Baechle" <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:17:23 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=X+XJs0KS7Cnke3rm8I5iC1sXWGfFTH1hvlCW8pz9vthEMHjKCJ2sF55Cde+/dWKicOqqAnNgK4zDE+DBxmVQecF4hDUWMZ5gDAneAMjLu64DGuzobx25LLTDjUuHsywfKIMrerWWd+CVsUU23QHrhyp5wf5ls5Zswk5L+uUXpdI=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <>
On 12/11/06, Ralf Baechle <> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:48:27PM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:

I just tested this on a Malta.  So patch 2/3 makes Malta die pretty
spectacularly, so I'm going to remve patches 2/3 and 3/3 again from my

When you'll have time, could you test only patch 2/3. It's only a
clean up patch, which eases integration of patch 3/3 ? This clean up
should improve current code even if you don't merge patch 3/3. And
more importantly,  knowing that patch 2/3 woks should help me to find
out what's wrong with your config.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>