| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: unwind_stack() and an exception at the last instruction (after the epilogue) |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:47:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, ths@networkno.de, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20061214.011651.31638583.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <b647ffbd0612130445r14895d70p4ea313f94dee8b41@mail.gmail.com> <20061213135222.GB25904@networkno.de> <b647ffbd0612130640r10bedda5l491679df882fe2e@mail.gmail.com> <20061214.011651.31638583.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:16:51AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > While current unwind_stack() is not perfect, any attempt to make it > robust is welcome. But you might have to analyze _all_ code if you > wanted to save _all_ case. I think UNIX's "90% principle" is good > enough here. If the current unwinder should ever become a problem we have the option of the DWARF2-based unwinder as backup. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IOC3/IOC4: PCI mem space resources, Brent Casavant |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | SGI Octane kernel patches fail, Jens Seidel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: unwind_stack() and an exception at the last instruction (after the epilogue), Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] IOC3/IOC4: PCI mem space resources, Brent Casavant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |