| To: | Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Import updates from i386's i8259.c |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:48:02 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, anemo@mba.sphere.ne.jp, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <4576C2E9.4060900@ru.mvista.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20061206.103923.71086192.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20061206015818.GB27985@linux-mips.org> <20061206.115602.63741871.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20061206.133836.89067271.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <4576C2E9.4060900@ru.mvista.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > +static struct irq_chip i8259A_chip = {
> > + .name = "XT-PIC",
> > + .mask = disable_8259A_irq,
> > + .unmask = enable_8259A_irq,
> > + .mask_ack = mask_and_ack_8259A,
> > };
>
> I wonder whose idea was to call this device XT-PIC. XT never had dual 8259A
> PICs and so was capable of handling only 8 IRQs. Dual 8259A was first used in
> the AT class machines...
Ask Ingo, perhaps... ;-) I think he was perfectly right, though -- this
is a pair of PC/XT-class PICs. And with the "IO-APIC-edge" and
"IO-APIC-level" alternatives back when the concept of IRQ controllers was
introduced, "XT-PIC" rather than "8259A" sounded quite right.
Maciej
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Import updates from i386's i8259.c, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Import updates from i386's i8259.c, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Import updates from i386's i8259.c, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Import updates from i386's i8259.c, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |