linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed

To: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:54:12 +0300
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <cda58cb80612010847g30213daau80c636b9dfc7dce3@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: MontaVista Software Inc.
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <457042FF.2060908@innova-card.com> <20061202.004527.52131670.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <cda58cb80612010847g30213daau80c636b9dfc7dce3@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
Hello.

Franck Bui-Huu wrote:

> @@ -468,6 +473,7 @@ config DDB5477
>  config MACH_VR41XX
>       bool "NEC VR41XX-based machines"
>       select SYS_HAS_CPU_VR41XX
> +     select GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
>
>  config PMC_YOSEMITE
>       bool "PMC-Sierra Yosemite eval board"

Same here.

are you sure ? I don't see any traces of i8259 selection.
Moreover, Yoichi's vr41xx boards seem to have no problem

CMB-Vr4133 has the Rockhopper backplane with 8259 integrated into ALi chip -- and it is supported via CONFIG_ROCKHOPPER.

I agree with all the rest.

Thanks

WBR, Sergei

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>