| To: | sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ? |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:22:14 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <45704569.8000807@ru.mvista.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <45704569.8000807@ru.mvista.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:08:25 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote: > > You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :) > > What's wrong with 8259 I wonder? It's happily converted to genirq by > other > arches... Indeed. I missed other arch's i8259.c had changed. Maybe we should update i8259.c entirely. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed, Franck Bui-Huu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |