[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:18:15 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F9490MT6fG8tJ30xxewsn+EDtTrlZgsw2MEmkowPbkZMOgMnWn4NwlvHw8GvOzBV4Ul3Mb247fT3GV/oM7LOXf6I6EU420zLp4mdo+Yj0PeGgQ1Ta9c5F9296ZPFiSzzWHVeZ66t6O6cgiXi4VREOZ+/3/5gx1dVJ6gto6YKIU8=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <>
On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <> wrote:
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:58:07 +0100, Franck Bui-Huu <> 
> __do_IRQ() is needed only by irq handlers that can't use
> default handler defined in kernel/irq/chip.c.
> For others platforms there's no need to compile this function
> since it won't be used. For those platforms this patch defines
> GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ symbol which is used exactly for
> this purpose.
> Futhermore for platforms which do not use __do_IRQ(), end()
> method which is part of the 'irq_chip' structure is not used.
> This patch simply removes this method in this case.

As I wrote in separate mail, I think I had fault on
ioasic_dma_irq_type.  So please drop some part from your patch.

Yes, I just noticed your latest patch which makes this one obsolete
and wrong. I'm going to drop DEC's part.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>