| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ? |
| From: | Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:08:25 +0300 |
| Cc: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> |
| Organization: | MontaVista Software Inc. |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80612010140y5a95faceybffedbd4dd9900db@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.185740.03976990.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 |
Hello. Atsushi Nemoto wrote: If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler, GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good. But we have i8259... That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ() anymore, well I think... You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :) What's wrong with 8259 I wonder? It's happily converted to genirq by other arches... --- Atsushi Nemoto WBR, Sergei |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Compile __do_IRQ() when really needed, Franck Bui-Huu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] use generic_handle_irq, handle_level_irq, handle_percpu_irq, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |