linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

To: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:12:52 +0900 (JST)
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <cda58cb80612010303x2bedf5betb11959158b292965@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80612010219p50334a6cj4a797dcd608376ed@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.194102.89066483.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80612010303x2bedf5betb11959158b292965@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:03:54 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > Also, if you selected GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ, you can remove .end
> > handler.  But adding "#ifdef GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ" for each
> > .end might be slightly ugly...
> 
> why not simply removing it since it won't be used anymore ?

Indeed.  If the irq chip was always used with flow handler we can
remove it.

---
Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>