[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <>
Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:12:22 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hh4qMNW+Cgkh4514GIaQhWqSn4RiDrunrDMfsgNKSczjALBJdMznBie8RI6zdc6W1lBiq1mbw605ftM7uGcGbHgvqxh7OczSuDAvGaXkLD9mJBr8xmt0AMgc7KDDBMLS1N/lCoeRmeQj8yYHI3lLOCImvYhWmQgXb9E73cGfMGQ=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <>
On 12/1/06, Franck Bui-Huu <> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <> wrote:
> Also, if you selected GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ, you can remove .end
> handler.  But adding "#ifdef GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ" for each
> .end might be slightly ugly...

why not simply removing it since it won't be used anymore ?

oops sorry I take it back, I already forgot my first wrong assumption...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>