linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:03:54 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r27rTY33VktGd72AYvDQ9VKenKKzqUtLuy5GgMyd0XjsdsqGyQDCZx2uP4SSojFr5O3w8vpSqX9p7lAFll8Fe7xMikyjO928EbL+Lbl+Hlc3kTkXsYoHxaAixtNbV0Ei09l2xB/4YubcVoSkz5AdkX/tTC5MgsZm4S399Q18Gdk=
In-reply-to: <20061201.194102.89066483.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80612010219p50334a6cj4a797dcd608376ed@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.194102.89066483.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

Also, if you selected GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ, you can remove .end
handler.  But adding "#ifdef GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ" for each
.end might be slightly ugly...


why not simply removing it since it won't be used anymore ?

--
              Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>