linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

To: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:10:49 +0900 (JST)
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80612010140y5a95faceybffedbd4dd9900db@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.185740.03976990.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:06:44 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler,
> > GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good.  But we have i8259...
> 
> That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config
> default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ()
> anymore, well I think...

You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :)

---
Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>