| To: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ? |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:10:49 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80612010140y5a95faceybffedbd4dd9900db@mail.gmail.com> <20061201.185740.03976990.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <cda58cb80612010206r51d319a1x72105981d900068a@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:06:44 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > > If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler, > > GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good. But we have i8259... > > That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config > default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ() > anymore, well I think... You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :) --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Franck Bui-Huu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |