Re: [PATCH] Use "long" for 64-bit values on 64-bit kernel.

[David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>]

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> Just resend again to avoid being obscured by discussion.
>
> This would get rid of some warnings about "long" vs. "long long".
>
> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-mips/addrspace.h b/include/asm-mips/addrspace.h
> index 45c706e..7401711 100644
> --- a/include/asm-mips/addrspace.h
> +++ b/include/asm-mips/addrspace.h
> @@ -19,12 +19,17 @@ #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>  #define _ATYPE_
>  #define _ATYPE32_
>  #define _ATYPE64_
> -#define _LLCONST_(x)   x
> +#define _CONST64_(x)   x
>  #else
>  #define _ATYPE_                __PTRDIFF_TYPE__
>  #define _ATYPE32_      int
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define _ATYPE64_      long
> +#define _CONST64_(x)   x ## L
> +#else
>  #define _ATYPE64_      long long
> -#define _LLCONST_(x)   x ## LL
> +#define _CONST64_(x)   x ## LL
> +#endif
>  #endif
This duplicates the things in asm-mips/types.h.  Is there some reason 
that we cannot use s64/u64 instead of long/long long?

David Daney.