Hi Ralf,
This patch has merged a few printk in check_wait().
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
diff -pruN -X mips/Documentation/dontdiff
mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
--- mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:20:24.397574000
+0900
+++ mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:28:53.113366750 +0900
@@ -120,11 +120,9 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_R3081:
case CPU_R3081E:
cpu_wait = r3081_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX3927:
cpu_wait = r39xx_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_R4200:
/* case CPU_R4300: */
@@ -146,35 +144,30 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_74K:
case CPU_PR4450:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX49XX:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait_irqoff;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_AU1000:
case CPU_AU1100:
case CPU_AU1500:
case CPU_AU1550:
case CPU_AU1200:
- if (allow_au1k_wait) {
+ if (allow_au1k_wait)
cpu_wait = au1k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
case CPU_RM9000:
- if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40) {
+ if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40)
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else {
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
- }
break;
default:
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
}
+
+ if (cpu_wait)
+ printk(" available.\n");
+ else
+ printk(" unavailable.\n");
}
void __init check_bugs32(void)
|