linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-5)

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-5)
From: girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:45:12 +0900
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=dxU9cjMjBdhim4j/32+a0qwmbCEJy32JAMJsHRwGJx+q4JPQ4yRQvXi6piYw4Zm49H3E4GnskRNtA9fpW541W4W7jQvAbPdZ4XA/1bK2bnluvG7nRS0JT86YBt51mfifsmU9VObasnTM6FSgN3OZ/Su/cR6BQtmJhh3+Nc1hMs8=
In-reply-to: <20060928232956.GE3394@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060928.003542.21929658.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <C140DCAC.7A1C%girishvg@gmail.com> <20060928232956.GE3394@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org

On Sep 29, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:58:02AM +0900, girish wrote:
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:58:02 +0900
Subject: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-4)
From:   girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
To:     Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
CC:     "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
        girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
        boundary="B_3242253489_7379959"


Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be preferred. Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org tree...

The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6.


In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for SPARSEMEM support in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during month of August ([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could you please
resend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks.

August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied already.

http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4

Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I have just upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I see the
changes. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with
2.6.16.16 kernel sources.


Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree. Let me
know if this is alright.

Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@gmail.com>

-#ifdef CONFIG_ISA
-       if (low < max_dma)
+       if (low < max_dma) }

This doesn't quite compile.


Stupid mistake. Fixed & resending.

Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@gmail.com>

Attachment: patch-pavafix-20060929
Description: Binary data



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>