On Sep 29, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:58:02AM +0900, girish wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:58:02 +0900
Subject: PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-4)
From: girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
CC: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
girish <girishvg@gmail.com>
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="B_3242253489_7379959"
Using just plain text and adding Signed-off-by line would be
preferred.
Also your patch seems against neither latest lmo nor kernel.org
tree...
The kernel sources I was referring to were 2.6.17-rc6.
In the meantime, I couldn't find the changes suggested for
SPARSEMEM support
in the main source tree. Especially the ones reviewed during
month of August
([PATCH] do not count pages in holes with sparsemem ...). Could
you please
resend the consolidated patch to the list? Thanks.
August? I sent the patch with that title in July and applied
already.
http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commit;h=239367b4
Again, I was referring to older sources, that is 2.6.17-rc6. I
have just
upgraded reference sources to 2.6.18 as mentioned above & now I
see the
changes. Thanks. In fact I am experimenting on highmem/sparsemem with
2.6.16.16 kernel sources.
Please find attached patch created from 2.6.18 (kernel.org) tree.
Let me
know if this is alright.
Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@gmail.com>
-#ifdef CONFIG_ISA
- if (low < max_dma)
+ if (low < max_dma) }
This doesn't quite compile.
Stupid mistake. Fixed & resending.
Signed-off-by: Girish V. Gulawani <girishvg@gmail.com>
patch-pavafix-20060929
Description: Binary data
|