RE: Kernel debugging contd.

[Jonathan Day <imipak@yahoo.com>]

--- Mark E Mason <mark.e.mason@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Ralf will have to answer that one, but I believe it
> was caught up in a
> general housecleaning of the MMU/cache code.

Ah! Can I use that as an excuse for never cleaning my
house? :)

Seriously, I wonder if it might be a good idea to have
code due to be housecleaned (in any significant way)
to have the old behaviour settable in a config flag,
or make a reverse patch available somewhere?

(What I'm trying to think of is a way for developers
to put in the least extra effort but still leave an
escape for people whose boards do really strange
things.)


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com