| To: | girishvg@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-2) |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:43:18 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <C13E1C13.6FDC%girishvg@gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060925.002616.126574366.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <C13E1C13.6FDC%girishvg@gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:51:46 +0900, girish <girishvg@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the patch again, attached as a text file. I don't have idea how > these macros should be on a 64bit machine, so I just left them as it is. > Could you please verify these macros again? Well, I should ask first: Why do you change __pa() and __va() ? I can not see point of ISMAPPED() testing. And these macros are used quite often so they should be as fast as possible. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] remove some redefinitions in hazard.h, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to emulate lw/sw instruction by lb/sb instruction, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-2), girish |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] cleanup hardcoding __pa/__va macros etc. (take-2), Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |